ID: Q147754
4.00 | 4.00
WINDOWS | WINDOWS NT
kbprg kbbuglist
The information in this article applies to:
The DTIME() and ETIME() functions incorrectly return zero for program execution and elapsed CPU time under Windows 95.
Windows 95 does not support the underlying Win32 API function calls accessed by these functions. This does not apply to Windows NT 3.51.
Use the TIMEF() function to profile CPU timings under Windows 95.
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article. We are researching this problem and will post new information here in the Microsoft Knowledge Base as it becomes available.
The following program under Windows NT 3.51 produces the correct elapsed time results for DTIME() and ETIME(). The same code under Windows 95 causes zero to be returned as the result, while TIMEF() works correctly under both operating systems.
C Compile options need: none
USE PORTLIB
REAL(4) DT0, DT1, ET0, ET1, TIMER(2)
REAL(8) ELAPSED_TIME
WRITE(*,*) 'Elapsed execution times...'
WRITE(*,*)
DT0 = DTIME(TIMER)
CALL SPEND_TIME
DT1 = DTIME(TIMER)
WRITE(*, '(A14,F6.3,A8)') 'Using DTIME: ', DT1-DT0, 'seconds'
ET0 = ETIME(TIMER)
CALL SPEND_TIME
ET1 = ETIME(TIMER)
WRITE(*, '(A14,F6.3,A8)') 'Using ETIME: ', ET1-ET0, 'seconds'
C Use the following code as a workaround under Windows 95
ELAPSED_TIME = TIMEF()
CALL SPEND_TIME
ELAPSED_TIME = TIMEF()
WRITE(*, '(A14,F6.3,A8)') 'Using TIMEF: ', ELAPSED_TIME, 'seconds'
END
SUBROUTINE SPEND_TIME
INTEGER I, J
DO I = 1, 1000000
J = J**2
END DO
END SUBROUTINE
Microsoft FORTRAN PowerStation 32 4.0 Books Online Readme.
Additional reference words: 4.00 KBCategory: kbprg kbbuglist KBSubcategory: FORTLngIss
Keywords : kbFortranPS kbLangFortran kbbuglist
Version : 4.00 | 4.00
Platform : NT WINDOWS
Last Reviewed: March 3, 1996