DOCUMENT:Q131203  29-JUL-2001  [visualc]
TITLE   :FIX: Missing '::' in Error C2579 for Ambiguous Overload
PRODUCT :Microsoft C Compiler
PROD/VER:winnt:
OPER/SYS:
KEYWORDS:kbCompiler kbCPPonly kbVCkbbuglist kbfixlist

======================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:

 - The C/C++ Compiler (CL.EXE), included with:
    - *EDITOR Please do not choose this product*Microsoft Visual C++ 32-bit Edition* use 241, 265, 225, versions 2.0, 2.1 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SYMPTOMS
========

A member function that is an ambiguous overload of another member function of
the class causes the compiler to generate a correct C2579 error message to
indicate that the parameter list is not sufficiently different to overload the
function. This behavior is as it should be.

However, in the error message, the scope resolution operator (::) is missing
between the class name and the function name used to indicate the problem. For
example, compiling the sample code shown in article causes the compiler to
generate this error :

   

   error C2579: 'TestClassTestFunc(int)' : parameter list not
                sufficiently different from
                'TestClassTestFunc(const int)'

The error should look like this:

   

   error C2579: 'TestClass::TestFunc(int)' : parameter list not
                sufficiently different from
                'TestClass::TestFunc(const int)'

This only happens with Visual C++, 32-bit Edition, versions 2.0 and 2.1. This
does not happen with Visual C++ version 1.0 for Windows NT nor does it happen
with the 16-bit versions of Visual C++.

NOTE: In Visual C++ 4.0, the text message of error C2579 has been corrected. It
now appears as follows:

   

   error C2579: '<function_name>(<parameter_list1>)' :
      parameter list not sufficiently different from
      '<function_name>(<parameter_list2>)'

STATUS
======

Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed at the
beginning of this article. This problem was corrected in Microsoft Visual C++,
32-bit Edition, version 4.0.

MORE INFORMATION
================

Sample Code to Demonstrate Problem
----------------------------------

   /* Compiler Options: /c
   */ 

   class TestClass
   {
    public:
        void TestFunc(const int i) {};
        void TestFunc(int i) {};       // Expecting C2579
   };

Additional query words: 2.00 2.10 8.0 8.00 8.0c 8.00c 9.0 9.00 9.1 9.10

======================================================================
Keywords          : kbCompiler kbCPPonly kbVC kbbuglist kbfixlist
Technology        : kbVCsearch kbAudDeveloper kbCVCComp
Version           : winnt:
Issue type        : kbbug
Solution Type     : kbfix

=============================================================================

THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS
PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND.  MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS
ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  IN NO
EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR
ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF
MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.  SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION
OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES
SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Copyright Microsoft Corporation 2001.