Err Msg: The Route Addition Failed: 87
ID: Q151795
|
The information in this article applies to:
-
Microsoft Windows NT Workstation versions 3.5, 3.51, 4.0
-
Microsoft Windows NT Server versions 3.5, 3.51, 4.0
SUMMARY
After you run a ROUTE ADD command, the following error message may appear:
The route addition failed: 87
This message alerts you that you have an addressing problem.
MORE INFORMATION
You will get the route addition error in at least these two
situations:
- If the gateway address you specify is not on the same logical subnet as
any of the network adapters in your system. For instance, if your system
had this configuration:
ip address 204.118.75.20
subnet mask 255.255.0.0
and you tried this command:
route add 204.110.0.0 204.110.76.23
where 204.110.0.0 is the remote subnet you want to reach and
204.110.76.23 is the gateway address you want to use, you will get the
error message because the gateway is not on the same logical subnet as
your system.
- If the destination address you enter is a specific host address rather
than a subnet address and you specify a netmask, you will get this
error.
For instance, using the same configuration as above, if you
wanted to reach this specific system:
ip address 204.110.15.3
subnet mask 255.255.0.0
valid local gateway 204.118.75.1
you might use this command:
route add 204.110.15.3 mask 255.255.0.0 204.118.75.1
and this command would give you the error 87 message. The ROUTE
command expects the subnet address 204.110.0.0 rather than the
specific destination address.
To correctly add a host route do not specify a netmask and by default NT
will use a netmask of 255.255.255.255, for example:
route add 204.110.15.3 204.118.75.1
Or use a subnet mask of all ones, 255.255.255.255, for example:
route add 204.110.15.3 MASK 255.255.255.255 204.118.75.1
The mask of all 255s (all 1s) means that the destination address of the
packet to be routed must exactly match the Network Address for this
route to be used.
Keywords : nttcp
Version : 3.5 3.51
Platform : WINDOWS
Issue type :
Last Reviewed: February 19, 1999