Remote Directory Lists Are Slower Than Local Directory ListingsID: Q177266
|
When you list the contents of a remote folder to which your computer is
connected by TCP/IP, the results may take much more time to display than
when you view a local folder.
NOTE: This delay occurs whether you use Windows NT Explorer or a command
prompt to view the folder.
Some additional delay when viewing a remote directory can be expected
because of the additional overhead involved with sending requests over the
network. How much delay can be attributed to this cause will depend on
various factors such as overall network bandwidth, current network usage,
cache size on the server, and so on.
One source of delay associated with processing a directory listing comes
directly from the interaction between the buffer sizes used by the SMB
protocol layer and the behavior of TCP/IP's delayed acknowledgements.
At the level where a Windows NT client is processing a "DIR" command,
Windows NT will, by default, request no more than 16,384 bytes or up to 170
files for each SMB "transact2 findnextfile" transaction. The number of
bytes for each file will vary, in general, based on the number of
characters in the names of the files being enumerated.
The SMB transaction may be transmitted in multiple blocks that, in turn,
may each require multiple IP frames to be transmitted over the network. If
the number of frames for each "block" is odd, greater than 1, and there is
no other network traffic between the systems involved, TCP/IP can fall into
a situation where it must incur a 200 millisecond delay for every partial
SMB response.
This problem is likely to be most pronounced in directories that contain
very many files or that contain files with very long names. One way to
determine whether you are likely experiencing this sort of delay is to
perform two DIR commands against the same directory simultaneously from two
separate command prompt windows. By adding a second source of network
traffic, there will be more TCP/IP frames that can carry acknowledgements
without having to wait for the delayed acknowledgement timer to expire.
Therefore, if this is the source of the delay, the speed of both directory
listings should be faster than one by itself. You may need to perform this
test several times because the timing of the two DIR commands is important.
WARNING: Using Registry Editor incorrectly can cause serious problems that
may require you to reinstall your operating system. Microsoft cannot
guarantee that problems resulting from the incorrect use of Registry Editor
can be solved. Use Registry Editor at your own risk.
For information about how to edit the registry, view the "Changing Keys And
Values" Help topic in Registry Editor (Regedit.exe) or the "Add and Delete
Information in the Registry" and "Edit Registry Data" Help topics in
Regedt32.exe. Note that you should back up the registry before you edit it.
To work around this issue, edit the SizReqBuf registery value using the
following steps:
According to RFC 1122, TCP uses delayed acknowledgments (acks) to reduce
the number of packets sent on the media. The Microsoft TCP/IP stack takes a
common approach to implementing delayed acks. As data is received by TCP on
a given connection, it only sends an acknowledgment back if one of the
following conditions is met:
File Name: Tcpipimp2.doc
Location : ftp.microsoft.com
Title : "Microsoft Windows NT 3.5/3.51/4.0: TCP/IP Implementation Details TCP/IP Protocol Stack and Services, Version 2.0"
Keywords : kbnetwork ntprotocol nttcp NTSrvWkst
Version : WinNT:4.0
Platform : winnt
Issue type : kbinfo
Last Reviewed: January 26, 1999