ID: Q172911
The information in this article applies to:
In the versions of Microsoft Excel listed at the beginning of this article, if you enter a formula in which the value 10 is raised to either a very large power or a very small power, the formula may return an incorrect result:
10 Raised to Expected Result Actual Result
-------------------------------------------------------------------
very large power #NUM! error 0, 0.1
very small power 0 #DIV/0! error, 10^<some value>
NOTE: These problems do not occur in earlier versions of Microsoft Excel.
Also, the problems do not occur when you raise a value other than 10 to
a very large power or a very small power; for example, =9^10000000000
correctly returns a #NUM! error.
These problems occur when you enter a formula in which the value 10 is raised to a power in one of the following ranges:
- greater than or equal to 2^31 (2,147,483,648) and
less than or equal to 10^308 (1 followed by 308 zeroes)
-or-
- less than or equal to -(2^31) (-2,147,483,648) and
greater than or equal to -(10^308) (-1 followed by 308 zeroes)
For example:
Formula you type Value returned
----------------------------------------
=10^2147483648 0
=10^10000000000 0.1
=10^(10^308) 0.1
These formulas should all return a #NUM! error, because the largest
positive number allowed in Microsoft Excel is 9.99999999999999E+307,
which is just less than 10^308.
Or:
Formula you type Value returned
----------------------------------------
=10^-2147483648 #DIV/0!
=10^-4294966989 1E+307
=10^-4294967295 10
=10^-(10^308) 10
These formulas should all return the value 0, because the smallest
positive number allowed in Microsoft Excel is 9.99999999999999E-307,
which is just above 0.
To prevent this problem from occurring, make sure that formulas in your workbooks do not raise the number 1.797 to a power larger than 308 or the number 2.225 smaller than -308.
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article.
Microsoft Excel supports positive values almost as large as 10^308 (a one followed by 308 zeroes) and almost as small as 10^-308 (a decimal point, followed by 308 zeroes and a one). Similar negative values are also supported. Smaller values are rounded to 0, and larger values are converted into a #NUM! error value.
For comparison, note that the estimated number of elementary particles in the known universe is 10^80, or a one followed by 80 zeroes. The smallest value used in physics is roughly 10^-33 centimeters, the scale at which quantum fluctuations are believed to exist. These values are well within the limits supported by Microsoft Excel; so, Microsoft Excel can work with any meaningful number in the universe.
With respect to the largest formula shown above: note that a googol is 10^100, or a 1 followed by 100 zeroes, and that a googolplex is 10^googol, or a 1 followed by 10^100 zeroes.
The correct result of the third formula shown above, =10^(1E+308), is a 1 followed by 10^308 zeroes. So, the result of the third formula is equivalent to the following:
googolplex*googolplex*googolplex*(10^(10^8))
So, it would take over (1 followed by 10^307 zeroes) universes to
contain (1 followed by 10^308 zeroes) elementary particles.
Additional query words: XL97 googol googolplex mantissa exponent
Keywords : xlformula
Platform : MACINTOSH WINDOWS
Issue type : kbbug
Solution Type : kbpending
Last Reviewed: June 28, 1999