DOCUMENT:Q218170 08-MAY-2002 [sna] TITLE :APPC Application Receives AP_ALLOCATION_FAILURE_RETRY In Error. PRODUCT :Microsoft SNA Server PROD/VER:WINDOWS:3.0,3.0SP1,3.0SP2,3.0SP3,4.0,4.0SP1,4.0SP2 OPER/SYS: KEYWORDS:kbsna300sp4fix kbsna400sp3fix ====================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information in this article applies to: - Microsoft SNA Server, versions 3.0, 3.0SP1, 3.0SP2, 3.0SP3, 4.0, 4.0SP1, 4.0SP2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SYMPTOMS ======== If an APPC or CPIC application attempts to allocate a conversation to the host, and LU6.2 session level security keys are mismatched between SNA Server and the host, the following problem may occur: - the Windows NT Application Event log may be filled with the following errors: Event ID: 22 Source: SNA Server Description: APPC session activation failure: BIND negotiated parameters unacceptable Sense data = 080F6051 Event ID: 26 Source: SNA Server Description: APPC session activation failure: session limit error NOTE: The sense code 080F6051 indicates a security violation, as documented in the IBM SNA Formats Guide (IBM doc #GA27-3136). - The host administrator may encounter numerous LU6.2 security errors on the NetView console or error log. CAUSE ===== If an APPC application issues an [MC_]ALLOCATE request, causing SNA Server to establish an LU6.2 session with the host, and if the host rejects the BIND request because of a session level security error (because of mismatch in session level security keys), SNA Server returns the wrong APPC error code to the APPC application: primary_rc = AP_ALLOCATION_ERROR (0x0003) secondary_rc = AP_ALLOCATION_FAILURE_RETRY (0x00000005) instead of indicating a more permanent error condition: primary_rc = AP_ALLOCATION_FAILURE (0x0003) secondary_rc = AP_ALLOCATION_FAILURE_NO_RETRY (0x00000004) When receiving AP_ALLOCATION_FAILURE_RETRY, the APPC program may choose to retry the allocate request. This would cause SNA Server to retry the BIND request, causing the host to reject the BIND request. RESOLUTION ========== SNA Server 4.0 -------------- To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for SNA Server version 4.0. For additional information, please see the following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: Q215838 How to Obtain the Latest SNA Server Version 4.0 Service Pack SNA Server 3.0 -------------- To resolve this problem, obtain the latest service pack for SNA Server version 3.0. For additional information, please see the following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: Q184307 How to Obtain the Latest SNA Server Version 3.0 Service Pack STATUS ====== Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in SNA Server versions 3.0 and 4.0. This problem was first corrected in SNA Server version 3.0 Service Pack 4 and SNA Server version 4.0 Service Pack 3. Additional query words: ====================================================================== Keywords : kbsna300sp4fix kbsna400sp3fix Technology : kbAudDeveloper kbSNAServSearch kbSNAServ300 kbSNAServ400 Version : WINDOWS:3.0,3.0SP1,3.0SP2,3.0SP3,4.0,4.0SP1,4.0SP2 Issue type : kbbug Solution Type : kbfix ============================================================================= THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY. Copyright Microsoft Corporation 2002.